The slow rise of wikis as popular authoring tools produced a series of
commercial ventures, such as
SocialText. Recently a new group of Web 2.0-oriented,
wiki-like services has appeared.
Writely is a good example of these. It
offers an easy-to-access, clean-looking, collaborative writing space, much like
JotSpot Live and
Writeboard. Users can quickly set up a web page focused on a
single document.
Unlike most wiki implementations, and contrary to the old wiki ethos,
Writely excludes all potential editors, save those invited by the creator via
email. Editing is advanced wiki, including multiple versions and rollback. Contributors are identifiable, unlike most wikis. Menus aren't intrusive, but
drop down through
AJAX.
From an information services support perspective, Writely has several
advantages. As a hosted site it looks relatively noncommercial. For backup and
migration purposes, Writely exports content into several formats, including HTML
and Word. In terms of training, the creation and content editing window is a
clear, simple WYSIWYG, easier to get into and more recognizable for
non-specialists than many wiki implementations. Writely can ingest uploaded
documents in common formats, such as Word.
Disadvantages are fairly evident. Like most Web 2.0 products, it's in
beta. As with any externally-hosted service, academic users are at the mercy of
someone else's business decisions. For Mac users, Safari has issues, and may
not be supported. Overall, however, the ease of use and good export renders Writely
worth the experiment.
How to cite this work
Bryan Alexander. "Writely." Academic Commons Issue Name (Spring 2008): 14 March 2010. <http://www.academiccommons.org/>.Bookmark/Search this post with: