Web 2.0
War Of The Worlds 2.0
Posted November 1st, 2008 by Peter D. Naegele, Oberlin College Department of Psychology
0 Comments | 342 Page Views
There was an thought provoking re-enactment of the War Of The Worlds broadcast yesterday on Twitter. The original idea came from Kris Kowal over at his Ask A Wizard blog.
New NERCOMP Workshop: Using Web 2.0 for Teaching and Learning
Posted September 3rd, 2008 by lisagatesphd@gm...
0 Comments | 903 Page Views
Get the latest analysis of the impact of Web 2.0 on higher education and see it in action at NERCOMP's Oct. 16th workshop.
NERCOMP Event: Educational Mash-Ups 2
Posted March 1st, 2008 by lisagatesphd@gm...
0 Comments | 286 Page Views
Registration is now open for NERCOMP's
upcoming workshop "Educational Mash-Ups 2."
Mashups, created by linking Web 2.0 applications together,
harness the collective intelligence of the internet to create dynamic displays
of engaging information that can be created for a wide variety of disciplines
and easily integrated into curriculums. This SIG will provide a snap shot how
Mashups have evolved in the past year, demonstrate tools that are emerging that
simplify the creation of Mashups such as Yahoo Pipes, Microsoft Popfly and
Dapper, show examples of educational Mashups and demonstrate how they were
built. The meeting will close with a roundtable session for sharing Mashup
ideas.
The Cult of the Amateur
Posted September 22nd, 2007 by Cheryl A. Casey, New York University
2 Comments | 1908 Page Views
Keen, Andrew. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 2007. 228 pp. Hardcover $22.95. ISBN 978-0-385-52080-5
Andrew Keen insists he is neither anti-technology nor anti-progress. Yet this veteran of the dot com era begins his recent book, The Cult of the Amateur (Doubleday/Currency, 2007), sounding much like a high-culture snob pooh-poohing the vulgar masses for having appropriated the Web as their own and, in the process, wreaking potential destruction on our economy, culture and values. Keen's polemic hints less at neo-Luddite dissent than at an underlying bitterness and resentment--at his own gullibility at having been so easily sucked into the Internet dream, and also at those who have taken the technology out of the hands of professionals like himself ("I almost became rich" [p. 11], he confesses in the beginning of the first chapter). Drawing on 19th-century evolutionary biologist T. H. Huxley's "infinite monkey theory," Keen fears what lies ahead when the masses are empowered with far-reaching technology. As the author describes it, Huxley's theorem asserts that if infinite monkeys are provided with infinite typewriters, one of these monkeys will eventually create a masterpiece. Keen updates and reverses the theorem, replacing monkeys with humans and typewriters with networked personal computers; and "instead of creating masterpieces, these millions and millions of exuberant monkeys--many with no more talent than our primate cousins--are creating an endless digital forest of mediocrity" (pp. 2-3). By the end of the introduction, a reader would have just cause to feel a bit insulted.
But if you haven't tossed the book out the window just yet as one extended tantrum--and are willing to patiently look past the author's continued candor on the infinite monkey metaphor--you begin to encounter a number of points that are likely to give you pause, possibly in alarm.
Andrew Keen insists he is neither anti-technology nor anti-progress. Yet this veteran of the dot com era begins his recent book, The Cult of the Amateur (Doubleday/Currency, 2007), sounding much like a high-culture snob pooh-poohing the vulgar masses for having appropriated the Web as their own and, in the process, wreaking potential destruction on our economy, culture and values. Keen's polemic hints less at neo-Luddite dissent than at an underlying bitterness and resentment--at his own gullibility at having been so easily sucked into the Internet dream, and also at those who have taken the technology out of the hands of professionals like himself ("I almost became rich" [p. 11], he confesses in the beginning of the first chapter). Drawing on 19th-century evolutionary biologist T. H. Huxley's "infinite monkey theory," Keen fears what lies ahead when the masses are empowered with far-reaching technology. As the author describes it, Huxley's theorem asserts that if infinite monkeys are provided with infinite typewriters, one of these monkeys will eventually create a masterpiece. Keen updates and reverses the theorem, replacing monkeys with humans and typewriters with networked personal computers; and "instead of creating masterpieces, these millions and millions of exuberant monkeys--many with no more talent than our primate cousins--are creating an endless digital forest of mediocrity" (pp. 2-3). By the end of the introduction, a reader would have just cause to feel a bit insulted.
But if you haven't tossed the book out the window just yet as one extended tantrum--and are willing to patiently look past the author's continued candor on the infinite monkey metaphor--you begin to encounter a number of points that are likely to give you pause, possibly in alarm.
CFP: CHArt (Computers and the History of Art) Conference: Digital Archive Fever, November 2007
Posted May 16th, 2007 by Jennifer Curran, Academic Commons
0 Comments | 1510 Page Views
We pass along this call for papers which has appeared on a number of listservs...
CHArt (Computers and the History of Art)
23rd Annual Conference
DIGITAL ARCHIVE FEVER
Thursday 8 - Friday 9 November 2007
London England - Venue to be confirmed
Museums, galleries, archives, libraries and media organisations such as publishers and film and broadcast companies, have traditionally mediated and controlled access to cultural resources and knowledge. What is the future of such "top-down" institutions in the age of "bottom-up" access to knowledge and cultural artifacts through what is generally known as Web 2.0 (encompassing YouTube, Bittorrent, Napster, Wikipedia, Google, MySpace and more)? Will such institutions respond to this threat to their cultural hegemony by resistance or adaptation? How can a museum or a gallery or, for that matter, a broadcasting company, appeal to an audience which has unprecedented access to cultural resources? How can institutions predicated on a cultural economy of scarcity compete in an emerging state of cultural abundance?
You.Niversity? A Review of Reconstruction's Special Issue: "Theories/Practices of Blogging"
Posted February 8th, 2007 by Kevin Wiliarty, Wesleyan University
3 Comments | 2074 Page Views
Amid what he calls "speculation and scuttlebutt" concerning blogging, Kevin Wiliarty finds a welcome antidote in this recently-published series of essays. True to the spirit of blogging, the contributions are diverse and international, covering a wide range of topics and disparate methodologies, from academic blogging, to blogging as a literary enterprise, to blogging in journalism and beyond. Wiliarty provocatively asks if more "effective usage of blogs is restricted, practical, and collaborative rather than public, expressive, and individual."
Use Web 2.0 to Plan Web 2.0
Posted December 12th, 2006 by Michael Roy, Middlebury College
0 Comments | 1275 Page Views
NITLE's Bryan Alexander is running an upcoming workshop
to develop plans for launching enterprise-wide roll-outs of Web 2.0
applications such as blogging, wikis, social bookmarking and
podcasting. Wesleyan University, Trinity College and Connecticut
College have developed some tagging conventions within del.icio.us
to share both examples of how these tools are being used in academic
contexts, and lists of candidate tools for implementation. The list of
tags can be found at http://wiki.academiccommons.org/wiki/TagSet. You can also find instructions there on how to subscribe to RSS feeds that del.icio.us generates to keep track of this initiative. And of course, if you have an account on del.icio.us, you are encouraged to contribute your own links to the pile.
