The strange persistence of conferences
Posted June 22nd, 2007 by Kevin Wiliarty, Wesleyan University
0 Comments | 451 Page Views
Tom Haskins offers a good reason why conferences remain important
even in a world of ever readier access to ever increasing information.
Haskins suggests that we need experts now more than ever, not for
access to information, but for evaluation and filtering. The point is
one that librarians, too, are fond of making, and it ought to cheer any
scholar, though it may feel to some that the rules are changing in the
middle of the game. And even if Haskins is correct—as I believe he
is—we still have no guarantee that the broader community will
appreciate just what it is that experts can offer them. A part of the
challenge for academia today ought to be to find ways to participate
persuasively in new media. Of course, careers are still made or broken
primarily in print, and surely that is another reason why conferences
persist; they continue, among other things, to bring scholars and print
publishers under one roof.
How to cite this work
Kevin Wiliarty. " The strange persistence of conferences." Academic Commons Issue Name (Spring 2008): 02 December 2008. <http://www.academiccommons.org/>.Bookmark/Search this post with:
Delicious
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Technorati